Jump To Navigation

Latest Legal News

Snohomish County, Washington, Full Service Law Firm

News

Litigation

[08/15] 6 get Legionnaires' disease in upstate NY; 1 dies
[08/15] Mistrial in Tenn. student's confederate flag suit
[08/15] Family of gay boy slain in Calif. blames school
[08/15] Jury rejects assault suit against Osteen's wife
[08/15] Shanghai official gets death sentence for bribery
[08/15] Court says copyrights apply even for free software
[08/15] Jackson Browne sues McCain, RNC over song in ad
[08/15] Trump to buy McMahon's home, let him live there

More...

Personal Injury

[08/19] NY state firefighters deliver 3 babies in transit
[08/19] Suit accuses restaurant of giving man big tapeworm
[08/19] Sailor, knocked from boat, rescued 12 hours later
[08/14] Calif. mom gives birth on front lawn by herself
[08/01] Boy, 4, tries to drive to grandma's house, crashes
[08/19] Stem cell advance may help transfusion supplies
[08/19] New study backs angioplasty through the wrist
[08/14] Drugs as good as stents for many heart patients

More...

Employment Practices

[08/15] Ask AP: Broken hips, illegal immigrants' impact
[08/15] 32 protesters arrested outside Disneyland
[08/14] BP says TNK-BP chief barred from office by Russia
[08/14] Sudanese can stay longer in US, continue working
[08/12] Study: Women rise in state government leadership
[08/12] Anheuser-Busch ups retirement plan for key workers
[08/12] Flooded Tyson plant in Wis. reopens, cuts jobs
[08/11] Verizon, 2 unions agree on new 3-year contact

More...

Business

[08/20] NY restaurant uses 1933 prices; Steaks: 90 cents
[08/13] Ohio man buys new truck with thousands of coins
[08/01] Clothing store opens bar in middle of sales floor
[08/19] Dividend checks to be distributed early in Alaska
[08/13] Feds nix new bus company licenses after crash
[07/30] Ships moving despite new oil leak on Mississippi
[07/29] California judge rules Sprint fees unlawful
[07/28] Insurer offers discounts to drivers with monitors

More...

Case Summaries

Family Law

[08/19] In re Aaron D.
Termination of mother's parental rights to her two children is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction over this case under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) because Texas had jurisdiction over custody determinations involving the children and the California juvenile court did not contact the Texas court to resolve jurisdiction; 2) mother did not receive proper notice of the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.261 selection and implementation hearing; and 3) the court erred in finding the children adoptable because of their special developmental needs, physical ailments, and psychosocial issues.

[08/19] In re David H.
Minor's removal from his mother's home is affirmed where there was substantial evidence that, at the time of a July 2007 hearing, the child faced a substantial risk of serious physical harm from mother because there was a substantial risk that mother would resort to physical violence in disciplining him.

[08/14] Lemons v. Bradbury
In an action brought by voters who signed a referendum, which sought a statewide vote on a legislative act establishing same-sex domestic partnerships, challenging the Oregon Secretary of State's procedures for verifying referendum petition signatures, denial of permanent injunctive relief for plaintiffs is affirmed where the Secretary's procedures for verifying sampled referendum petition signatures did not violate plaintiffs' equal protection and due process rights.

[08/12] Choin v. Mukasey
Russian native's petition for review of a decision denying her application for adjustment of status and ordering her removed is granted where: 1) the BIA erroneously interpreted the "as a result of the marriage of the nonimmigrant" language in INA section 245(d); 2) the plain language of section 245 is ambiguous; 3) nothing in the plain language of section 245(d) suggests that an application that was valid when submitted should be automatically invalid when a petitioner's marriage ends by divorce two years later; and 4) the statute also does not require the automatic removal of immigrants whose marriages end in divorce while their applications for adjustment of status are under agency consideration.

[08/11] Vale v. Avila
Grant of father's petition to return his children to Venezuela under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act is affirmed where the childrens' place of habitual residence was properly determined to be Venezuela, and the custody rights held by father under Venezuelan law were violated by mother's removal of the children to the US.

[08/08] Jonathan L. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
In a dependency proceeding involving the legality of, and restraints upon, home schooling in California, denial of motion requiring children to attend public or traditional private school is vacated and remanded where: 1) California statutes permit home schooling as a species of private school education; and 2) the statutory permission to home school may constitutionally be overridden in order to protect the safety of a child who has been declared dependent. (Opinion on rehearing)

[08/07] In re Esperanza
Orders denying petitions for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and order terminating parental rights under section 366.26 are reversed where the juvenile court has jurisdiction to review the social services agency's denial of a criminal records exemption for abuse of discretion.

[08/06] US v. Flores-Villar
The circuit court rejects challenges under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment's due process clause on the basis of age and gender to two former sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which impose a five-year residence requirement, after the age of fourteen, on U.S. citizen fathers, but not on U.S. citizen mothers, before they may transmit citizenship to a child born out of wedlock abroad to a non-citizen.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Call Us Today (425) 259-2222
Location

3411 Colby Avenue
Everett, WA 98201
Ph: (425) 259-2222
Fax: (425) 259-2033
Email Firm Here


FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

Located in Everett, Washington, the full service litigation lawyers of the Deno Millikan Law Firm, PLLC, represent clients in Snohomish County, Skagit County and King County communities such as Lynnwood, Edmonds, Bothell, Marysville, Arlington, Lake Stevens, Snohomish, Monroe, Mill Creek, Canyon Creek, Stanwood, Smokey Point, Mukilteo, Darrington, Granite Falls, Mount Vernon, Burlington, Anacortes and LaConnor, WA.